On 3/10/2015 7:15 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:59:41 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/10/2015 5:55 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:25:13 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/10/2015 5:08 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/10/15 4:34 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/10/2015 4:26 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 3/10/2015 3:55 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:24:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 3/10/2015 3:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/10/2015 2:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

Hillary is about to take the podium and explain the email mess.

It will take a lot of will power, but I'll watch and listen to her.



Does a Blackberry only allow one email address?

She keeps talking about not wanting to carry around *two* devices.

I know nothing about Blackberry cell phones but I know the Droid I
have allows (and has) several email addresses that I use and they
all work.




Ok. One of the commentators on CNN explained this. Yes, a
Blackberry
can handle more than one email account however fed regulations at the
time did not allow having a dot gov account on the same device that
also
has a personal email account.

That regulation has been changed now.


I was in the doctor's office. So, are you going to vote for her now.
Is she
believable? Did she do this in the interest of our country?



I would say that she gave a believable story. She admitted that in
retrospect it would have been better to carry two devices and have a
dot.gov email account.

The only testiness she showed was when she was asked if she'd go along
with an impartial review of the private server and of the emails she
did
not release. In typical Hillary fashion she made it clear .... "No".

Will I vote for Hillary? Hell no, and it has nothing to do with
emails.
I could never in good conscience knowingly vote for a deceitful,
dishonest liar for POTUS.
------
Well, then, you certainly won't be voting for any of the lying repubs
who
will like get the nomination.



Could be. I'd rather not vote.



Well, you could always throw your vote away on some bat**** crazy
loonytarian.


I don't do that. If there is not a candidate that I can support or
trust, I won't vote. Happened before. The support or trust can become
lost due to actions after being elected but I can't support someone
who I know is deceitful or a liar before they are elected.

That's Hillary.


I can't see that. If nothing else, I will vote for what I believe to be the 'lesser
of two evils'. The idea of letting the 'greater of two evils' become president
because I don't 'like' either of the candidates is a copout, IMHO.


Call it what you will but I'll be dipped if I am going to vote for
someone who's a demonstrated liar for POTUS. I don't care which party
they are members of.


I was keying more on this sentence, "If there is not a candidate that I can support
or trust, I won't vote."

If both candidates are proven liars, like Hillary, then choice becomes which liar
will do the country the most good or least harm.


If you are comfortable with the "almost pregnant" logic, go for it.

I can understand mistakes, errors in judgement and bad past decisions
.... especially when are acknowledged but I can't in good conscience cast
a vote of support for someone who has outright lied to further their
political careers.

It's like that creep who claimed to be a decorated Vietnam Vet in order
to garner votes only to be exposed as a complete liar. Hillary is not
dissimilar.