BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Mr. Luddite

On 4/22/2015 5:53 AM, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 1:05:50 AM UTC-7, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/21/2015 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Mrs. Clinton is unilaterally deciding which questions she will answer
and which ones she will not.

So what? Why should she answer "Did you stop beating your husband" type
questions? She is telling her opponents to pound sand. Just like I
told you she would do. If your "feelings" are hurt - good for you.

Don't know if there is anything to the book by Peter Schweizer entitled
"Clinton Cash" that will be released next month or not
It reportedly ties her activities as Sec. of State to lucrative speaking
engagement contracts for hubby Bill. We'll have to wait and see what
the detailed evidence is.

Why wait? Wild and unsupported accusations should be good enough.

Meanwhile, Mrs. C. has brushed it off as a "Republican "distraction"
from the issues of her campaign. She didn't confirm or deny the book's
allegations. She simply refused to answer the journalist's question
(again) and answered what *she* wanted to answer.

IOW "pound sand."

And, of course, there's no email evidence of any secret "deals".
Her server files have been sanitized.

Master criminals such as HRC don't use email to commit their dastardly
deeds. You have to get them on tape.

Again, I don't know if the allegations made in Schweizer's book are
true or not or if they can be proved. But, if they can, Hillary is toast.

She may be toast anyway. People are increasingly becoming suspicious
and uncomfortable with her evasiveness in telling the truth.

So if it proved she did dastardly deeds she is toast.
And if it's NOT proved she did dastardly deeds she is toast.
Isn't that something like tying weights to a suspected witch, tossing
her in a pond, and if she floats back up she's a witch?
Worked well enough in Salem, and you're just down the road after all.

Over the top, ridiculous comments (as usual). All I am saying is the
public has a right to hear answers to questions asked of anyone who
wants to be trusted with the office of POTUS. Those questions may
be uncomfortable from time to time. So far Hillary has demonstrated
an attitude of entitlement to the nomination and office.

She's a proven liar. When caught in one of her lies she basically
gives the public the royal finger.

If you want to support and elect someone like that as your next POTUS
have at it. Obviously you are "Ready for Hillary".

I will never forget her enemies' list, and the subsequent "Filegate", the disappearance of the FBI files of all her enemies. After a long search the FBI finally discovered them in Hillary's bedroom. But there are so many of her misdeeds. Fortunately, in this day and age there is a record of all of them.

Besides, Hillary needs to take ownership and give a true apology for her valor stealing attempts she made with her lies of "I ran from snipers in Bosnia, now that's what happened". The cover up lie "I misspoke" is hurting her badly.

If asked ... and assuming she would answer ... it would probably be:

"At this point, what difference does it make?"

(and then a silent "pound sand")