|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2015
Posts: 143
|
|
Hillary's campaign strategy
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2015 3:40 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
On 4/22/2015 2:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Indeed, I don't vote for candidates who are opposed to gay
marriage; who
are enemies of blacks, latinos, and other racial and ethnic
minorities;
who want more tax cuts for the very wealthy at the expense of
middle and
lower income wage earners; who are anti-abortion; who believe in
Creationism but not evolution; who are opposed to the ACA, Medicare
and
Medicaid; who deny mankind is a major contributor to negative climate
change; who think capital is worth more than labor; who oppose
sensible
handgun control, and who want to get rid of environmental protections
and safeguards over prescriptions, food, worker safety, clean
water, et
cetera.
Unfortunately, *all* Republican presidential candidates seem to want
these days are that which are anti-societal.
That's a pretty broad brush and highly partisan bunch of meaningless
words when you try to imply that *all* Republican candidates fall into
your list of qualifying criteria. For example, some have expressed
their *personal* views on subjects while qualifying that their personal
views do not and should not be reflected in a democratic legislative
process. In everything there must be a balance. The pendulum has
swung
to it's liberal extreme and it's time now for some correction.
Personal beliefs have a way of finding themselves represented on SCOTUS.
"Liberal extreme." Just what is that, in your opinion?
The ACA? Here to stay in its essence. It should go single-payer.
Gay marriage? Hasn't been decided. But it will be.
Just what are your "liberal extremes?"
Do you want prayer in school?
A continued Cuba embargo?
Not enough wars for you? Or too many?
Are you against the "War on Christmas?"
I am against political nutcases like you.
Kevin is out there...
|