On 6/16/2015 6:38 AM, John H. wrote:
Context added:

On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 10:57:29 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

True North wrote:
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 16:58:19 UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


In Harry's case, they would probably look at him like a canary in a coal
mine...trying to call out to warn people of impending disaster looming
just out of sight....and that would be personal greed and corruption.
In Dickson's case...they would see him exactly as he is..a pathetic
pervert desperate for attention...any attention.
What side do you want to be seen on, Kalif??

Scott Adams misspelled Harry's moniker to, June 7.
http://dilbert.com

===

Funny stuff, thanks. Of course greed and corruption are brand new
vices that were undiscovered until Harry and the internet came along.
How perceptive of him, and how useful if you're looking for some
excuse to default on your loans and taxes.

Don, my advice is to pick your heros carefully.

On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

I don't have any hero's, Wayne.

I think Donnie will turn around once Harry's gone.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."