Thread
:
IAFIS and now NGI
View Single Post
#
39
posted to rec.boats
Mr. Luddite
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
IAFIS and now NGI
On 1/9/2016 2:09 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:27:18 -0500, John H.
wrote:
Once it's left the hands of the original owner by theft, the trail goes
cold. Does it really matter if the serial number is obliterated.
Guns aren't the problem. The bad guys are. And we haven't figured out
how to catch them or what to do with them if and when they are caught.
If they break a federal law, they should be put in front of a federal judge who may
do a bit more than a locally elected or appointed 'hand slapper'.
===
My personal opinion is that it all comes down to priorities, resources
and political expediency. The feds already have a lot on their plate
trying to prosecute the losing war on drugs. They have limited
resources that have to be used in the most politically expedient way,
i.e., create the most favorable public perception and publicity.
There's just no drama in prosecuting someone who lied on a federal
form and there's a good chance a judge would throw it out rather than
tie up his courtroom. Creating more meaningless laws would probably
result in the same type of lookaside non-enforcement.
I agree with you. The only comment I would make is that if everyone
had to have a background check, more of those inclined to lie on the
form would be discovered and denied. From a priority point of view
that's more important than what punishment they get for lying.
Reply With Quote
Mr. Luddite
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Mr. Luddite