On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:11:18 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Wrote in message:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:45:51 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:


StinkyJim farts...

"Progressives need to push for demolishing all multi stall
bathrooms and replaceing them with individual lockable bathrooms
so the gays and libs can shoot up in privacy. Might even borrow
the handicap parking only idea and designate gay only and not
sure only privileged pottys."


Boy, you demand a lot for yourself and your buddies.

The strange thing in this is that Trump actually supports pooper
equality for the LGBTQ community. The main objection comes from women
and they are supposed to be Hillary's people. I wonder if Mrs Beasley
really likes the idea of transvestites and crossdressers sitting on
the couch in the ladies can commenting on her shoes and makeup.


From your tone you seem to dis favor those types visiting the same
facility as you do. I guess you arent totally ignorant after
all.

I just think there are unintended consequences to these policies. I do
agree that it is going to lead to "one holers" in as many places as
possible. We already have that in a lot of public places, they are
currently called "family" bathrooms, designed for people with kids of
the opposite sex from the guardian. These rooms are, by nature, gender
neutral and should fulfill the intended need.
I do think that in most of flyover America, it is women who are
uncomfortable when men in a dress being in the bathroom with them. I
bet that is also true of many in the urban areas too.
Women in the mens room is really not that unusual if you have ever
been to a sporting event or a rock concert where the line at the
ladies room backs up into the stands. There is a little grumbling from
time to time but not any real concern.
The concern really comes from the precedent that any man who just
wants to get his girl on that day will be camping it up in the ladies
room with impunity.