On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:06:20 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

You still don't get it. The libertarian view is not that these things
are totally unregulated, just that the regulation is not so oppressive
as to shut out competition.

As for the "Taco Truck" reference, it is just silly. The illegal is
already there, cutting the grass.


Oh, your assumption is that if Mexicans are working here, they are
illegals. Right, I get it. I'll be sure to share that with the Mexican
landscaper whose services I use several times a year, along with his
sons and sons-in-law, all legal, and with my Mexican friends who own and
operate a chain of Mexican restaurants, where all the owners and
employees are legal.


You are too short boy, the fast ones go over your head - Foghorn
Leghorn
No, the point is if someone is illegal they will be relegated to the
worst, off the books, cash jobs and they tend to be digging or cutting
grass.


As for the "libertarian view," get back to me when the libertarians win
some federal elections. Until that happens and in significant numbers,
the libertarian view has no more clout than the Rosicrucian view.

They will start winning as soon as people start thinking the Ds and
the Rs are not everything available and this is the cycle to do it.
You are a red dog democrat and you admit Hillary is not the best
candidate they could come up with. Then there is Trump that mainstream
republicans are leaving skid marks trying to get away from. There is a
hole in the middle that someone should fill, even if he doesn't win.
As I said, these are not a couple hippies with their hair on fire. We
are talking about 2 moderate governors from rational states.

What do you have to lose?