On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:24:37 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 9/5/16 7:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:06:20 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

You still don't get it. The libertarian view is not that these things
are totally unregulated, just that the regulation is not so oppressive
as to shut out competition.

As for the "Taco Truck" reference, it is just silly. The illegal is
already there, cutting the grass.


Oh, your assumption is that if Mexicans are working here, they are
illegals. Right, I get it. I'll be sure to share that with the Mexican
landscaper whose services I use several times a year, along with his
sons and sons-in-law, all legal, and with my Mexican friends who own and
operate a chain of Mexican restaurants, where all the owners and
employees are legal.


You are too short boy, the fast ones go over your head - Foghorn
Leghorn
No, the point is if someone is illegal they will be relegated to the
worst, off the books, cash jobs and they tend to be digging or cutting
grass.


Hey, it is tough work. I'm glad there are some people willing to do it.

I am not the guy to argue this. As long as they want to work, welcome
to America. It is the second generation Bill is talking about that
worries people.

As for the "libertarian view," get back to me when the libertarians win
some federal elections. Until that happens and in significant numbers,
the libertarian view has no more clout than the Rosicrucian view.

They will start winning as soon as people start thinking the Ds and
the Rs are not everything available and this is the cycle to do it.
You are a red dog democrat and you admit Hillary is not the best
candidate they could come up with. Then there is Trump that mainstream
republicans are leaving skid marks trying to get away from. There is a
hole in the middle that someone should fill, even if he doesn't win.
As I said, these are not a couple hippies with their hair on fire. We
are talking about 2 moderate governors from rational states.

What do you have to lose?


Everything. The Libertarians are nothing more than Republicans who have
less social conscience than the mainstream Republicans of old, but with
less social conscience. I've read Johnson's party platform...it's pretty
much the way it was the last time around, and it is a horror story in
many regards. Your Libertarian candidates are not guys in the middle.

I don't admit that Hillary is not the best candidate the party could
come up with. There were only three candidates from which to choose, and
she is by far the best.

We have a congress that will be sure Johnson and Weld don't fire all
the health inspectors and sell Yellowstone to the Koch brothers but
they do have a track record in New Mexico and Massachusetts that we
can look at, They will end up looking better than Trump or Hillary if
you look.