On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.