|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
|
|
Did You See Cuomo today
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/20 11:55 PM, Bill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/23/2020 9:12 PM, wrote:
He is projecting that 2.7 million New Yorkers had the virus and
spontaneously recovered. He is basing that on projecting the largest
number of antibody testing results we have seen, across his
population.
That knocks the hell out of a lot of the scary **** if it is true. His
death rate is around 0.3% (infected to dead)
That makes it about as dangerous as riding a motorcycle for 5 years.
;-) (6 million motorcycles, 4500 dead every year.
BTW if you could project New York's numbers nation wide, 50 Million of
us are over it
... Or the tests the left has pushed Cuomo into using is bogus ;-)
It is funny how guys like Harry suddenly became Libertarian when
people point out the reason why the feds don't test everyone is that
there are no tests that have actually gone through a real FDA study
and we don't want to make 350 million bad tests.
At that point they start wanting to short cut the FDA study process
and cut the red tape. (what they did to get the tests Cuomo is using)
That was what Gary wanted ;-)
It will be great until we find out Cuomo's tests are bad.
OTOH if it turns out they were right, all of this lockdown starts
looking pretty silly.
If I were forced to cast blame for this cluster f*&$m, it would have
to be on all the scientists and experts who develop and interpret
the models being used to guess at what the results will be.
With all due respect to them, we've already seen many of the
initial assumptions made by Docs Fauci and Birx proven to be dead wrong.
The only thing proven to be effective is quarantining which
has been how epidemics and pandemics have been handled for
100's of years. Some researchers say it goes back to
5000BC in China of all places.
Some of the suggestions and recommendations that sound a
little bizarre initially just may have some credence.
Old fashioned "brain storming" often leads to some new
ways of looking at things and new ideas on how to solve
a problem. Weird ideas shouldn't be automatically rejected
just because they don't have a 2 year academia based
research study to base them on.
But according to some here, if there are not a lot of university letters
after your name, or not gone to several universities, you know nothing.
Bilious, I suggest you daily swallow a glassful of Lysol and shove a UV
light bulb up your ass, per Donald Trump, the "lettered" scientist.
Report back to us.
Your letters after your name, have not helped you to not be a deadbeat,
whose biggest claim to professional writing is massive cut and paste
plagiarizing.
|