I am right and you are wrong. It will take much more than
saying I am 'hilarious to prove your point. I responded by
listing the Rules that back up my point. You respond with
obfuscation.

That makes you ineffective and laughable.




"Shen44" wrote in message ...
Subject: Ellen MacArthur, Tthe Reluctant Heroine
From: "Simple Simon"
Date: 08/04/2003 13:47 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:






"Shen44" wrote in message
...

A motorboat towing sounds the signal of a motor vessel unless
the motorboat towing is restricted in its ability to maneuver (RAM).

Where, AGAIN, does it say that in the rules????? Comeon Neal .... Show us
all
where it says this!! (no response expected)

It says it in Rule 3 under the definition of RAM. Note there is no
class of vessels called towboat or towing and that's because there
is no such class because a two boat fits into the class of powerboat



The only time a vessel towing is allow to sound the one prolonged/
two short blasts fog signal is if the towboat is a RAM. If and only
if the towboat is showing lights or shapes of a RAM can it sound
the signal of a RAM. (legally speaking that is - you in your ignorance
might feel differently and have probably done differently.)

Show me where it says this in the rules !!!! (still no response expected
EG)

Rule 35.

HUH? how do you come up with that nonsense?


The fact still remains that vessels sounding the one prolong blast
fog signal or even the two prolonged blast fog signal must not impede
any vessel sounding the one prolonged/two short blast fog signal.

Where's it say dat?


It says it in Rule 8 paragraph (f) (i).

Satisfied?

ROFLMAO we must be reading a different set of rules I just gotta get me a copy
with your translations.

Neal, even when you at least try to come up with an explanation, you are sooooo
far off that it's hilarious.