-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:16:33 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
wrote:

I'd have to agree with RB - what's the value of your list?

And RB's "pregnancy" was not his post - it was a forgery; a good hoax,
since it was consistent with much of his nonsense. I assumed he
forget his meds that day.

And what's with the PGP silliness? It doesn't prevent any forgeries -
it just makes your posts look stupid.

If the "SHA1 hash" doesn't "verify" for one of these two "PGP
fingerprints":

Before 9/4/2003:
C7B4 9CA6 9698 01D2 2823 DF72 F151 AD95 DA1D AF09

After 9/4/2003:
4753 0A55 AB76 FFE8 BF6A 95C1 D081 036D DEC9 FE39

Then assume I didn't write it.

On the otherhand, if the PGP message signature does "verify" for one of
the above "fingerprints," then I can't really disavow it.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----