rick wrote:

He is correct and your response is so typical of what remains of this NG
You cast aspersions upon his good name you cowardly beast you. you
besmirch his integrity whilst hiding like a child behind the dress of the
internet.
Fact is, given the amount of traffic in the "triangle" there is no reason
to break from parcimony; the easy explainations will do.
I fully expect you to pick up your pride and realize you have erred and
will nothing more to say on the subject unless you do it with the respect
and diginty this man deserves............kakkakkakk!!
now go back to sleep and dream of when you actually used to sail.
rick

Good God Rick, are you mad? Have you not followed the weeks, nay, months, perhaps
years of vitriol that has been exchanged between Ganz and Booby? Why should you expect
the leopard to change his spots in this instance?

You are however correct about the veracity of the Boobster's claim in this case, were
it otherwise (the risk that is) Lloyds would require additional premiums for policies
covering vessels intending to ply those waters and such is not the case.

Cheers
Marty