Winston wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:20:08 -0400, A boater A
wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-09-12-bush-documents_x.htm
*Some experts pointed to the small "th" symbol raised above the line
of type as the kind of symbol that could be produced only by computer.
But a separate document released by the White House in February as
part of Bush's military file contains a similar but not identical
small "th" character on a form listing Bush's service assignments.
The more I read about this, the more it sounds like the NeoCons got
caught with their shorts down and they are doing a little dance to
divert attention from their nakedness. Let's all talk about the
typography, not about the contents. Typical Republican dirty trick.
I'm a Republican, but that particular habit has always bothered me.
No less so now.
My take entirely. Let's talk about the Bush record. I defy anyone
to explain why we should re-up this guy.
Resources - Bush & Kerry military records
http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/election2004/docs.html#gbush
--
W§ mostly in m.s - http://members.1stconnect.com/anozira