OzOne wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:02:10 -0400, "Vito"
scribbled thusly:
"Joe" wrote
You under estimate the American people. We have had it with terroists, and
threats.
Absolutely. Now if we could just find any decent leadership .....
Saddam had to go.
Why? He had zip to do with the terrorists who attacked us. In fact, they
hated him and his secular government more than they hated us - and vice
versa. Logically, from a pro-America standpoint, we should have paid Saddam
to go after Al Quida. But no, Bush pulled assets away from the war on terror
to go after Osama's other enemy, Saddam. Eliminating one of the terrorists'
enemies makes zero sense from a pro- America standpoint, especially when we
took pressure off our mutual enemy to do it. Now we're in a $trillion
quagmire that looks more like 'nam every day and Osama is laughing up his
sleeve
AND Bush says he'd do it all again EXACTLY the same!
Surely no-one is that stupid!
Sadly some people are, and it is a distinct possibility he will be
re-elected by his peers.
Cheers
|