"Karl Denninger" wrote in message
ink.net...

In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray
being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.

Specifically, "global warming", were it real, would tend to DIMINISH
hurricane activity since it would lessen the gradients that drive these
storms.

Second, there is a roughly 30 year cycle in hurricane activity, with 60
years for a complete "cycle".

We have been in a 30 year LOW. Now we're entering a 30 year HIGH. The
last
"high" cycle ended roughly in 1970.

If you actually LOOK at the data, instead of simply trying to fit what's
happening to something you WANT to see, this becomes rather obvious.

Indeed, it requires no "hard science" - just a look at the numbers. The
40s
to 70s had more hurricanes, the 70s to 00s had less, the 10s to 40s had
more, etc.

What this means is that we're due for 30 years of this chit - and it has
nothing to do with "global anything"; its a normal cyclical weather
pattern.

Just like the water levels in the great lakes......there is a cycle from low
to high....as the water fell, it was blamed on global warming, now that it
is rising once again, no doubt, that too will be blamed on global warming.

Because global warming is based on such bad science, anything and everything
can be pinned on it.....all with no proof.



--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights
Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind