In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


thunder wrote:


Yup, except the nuclear technology didn't come from us. It came from the
Pakistanis and China. North Korea is a hard case. With a million plus,
well armed, well trained, well indoctrinated army, solutions are limited.
IMHO, military threats are pointless, resulting in the situation we wish
to avoid. It seems to me, there are only two plausible ways of dealing
with North Korea. Isolation, in the hopes they will collapse, and,
bribery and dialog. The second is the route Clinton chose. While you may
consider it a failure, I would say it is too early to tell. Remember,
China was at one time in a similar isolated circumstance to North Korea.
Nixon chose dialog and it has seemed to be successful.


Talk, talk, talk is better than war, war, war. Karl thinks we can win a
nuclear war.

Harry, are you EVER going to argue the point put on the table rather than
throw ad-hominen attacks and false statements out in response to a request
for a debate?

Which would you rather deal with:

1. A conventional war NOW against Iran.
2. Attempting to "talk" in order to stop Iran from detonating a SECOND
nuclear device once Tel Aviv has been rendered a flat piece of
high-quality glass.

Those are your options, and Kerry's policy towards Iran will leave you
with (2) as the only option available.

Your method of "debating the issues" matches almost exactly that of Terry
McAuliffe. The scary part is that if your poster boy wins, that's exactly
the same kind of approach that your buddies will use in their foreign
policy.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind