Dave wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:43 -0500, "Vito" said:


ie if they can find enough other evidence based
on

your "confession" or their illegal search they're home free.

[snip[

The only deterrent was that evidence obtained thereby would be
tossed out.


And you don't recognize the inconsistency between these two statements?



What Vito is leaving out is the reason the police give in court for "finding" the corrabative evidence,
i.e., "a confidential informant told me that the perp had four and half keys of coke in the water tank of
his toilet.", see?

Cheers
Marty