NOYB wrote:

The Clinton Administration decided to address terrorism as a criminal act,
and punish the perpetrators...rather than consider it a state-sanctioned
act. The reason? Because then it would mean having to find the country
responsible and going to war with them...something Clinton didn't have the
stomach to do.

Or it could be, that although he did enjoy an illicit blow job or two, Clinton
actually had the moral integrity to not become a terrorst himself. Bush could
not resist temptation, especially when it meant lots of profits for his &
Cheney's military industrialist cronies.

JohnH does not have an answer for the obliterating of an entire block of
downtown Baghdad, and everyone unlucky enough to be there at that moment, trying
to get Saddam. Do you?

Would you like to comment on the morality of Rumsfelds assassination program?

DSK