View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why Ficht failed no1

K Smith wrote:

Anyway I note you have no challenge to the material so far???


All you have done, aside from reinforcing the local
consensus that you are an obsessed loon, is to state a bunch
of internal combustion engine truisms. You have posted
nothing new, controversial, or not well understood by nearly
everyone who has a passing association with the art. What
you posted is the foundation of the technology and contains
nothing peculiar to any manufacturer.

Your troll has worked, you got some attention, you stirred
up some bored people, myself included, but other than that
you have failed to make a single statement to support or
dispute any manufacturer's claims or technology.

Only you know why you started this thread, it has no
foundation in fact as a reasonable and reasoned statement on
the validity of the Ficht technology. It is a very
enlightening illustration of an altered mental state, which
few here will deny, and adds nothing to the debate which
seems to have passed with the improvements made since you
suffered your initial insult.

Let it go, get over it. Speaking for myself at least, I
could care less what you think about Ficht and even less
about what you think about any other poster.

If any single poster on this group could be discribed as
irrelevant, it is you. And that is a fact by any definition.

Rick