|
|
|
|
wrote in message
oups.com...
John H wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote:
Newsgroup Reader wrote:
If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since
I do
not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no
reason to
apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you
prefer.
Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble.
The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad
thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like
Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I
are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist
on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove
to you I'm not Kevin Noble.
In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a
pretty
broad statement!
--
John H
Get the idea, nitwit?
2nd post of the day and 1 insult to a NG member already.
|