View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How many have during Bush's watch?


NOYB wrote:
Bush didn't give N. Korea $4 billion in aid in exchange for an empty
promise.


Got any proof it was just an "empty promise"?

Looks to me (and the rest of the world) that their promise was good...
they didn't build nukes until well after President Bush came into office
and kicked over the applecart.




How many do you think will?



I don't believe Bush will give any aid to Kim...so the question is moot.


Then why is Condi making offers? So as to make another hollow gesture at
diplomacy?


Or Iran?



I think it's more likely that Israeli or US forces will strike suspected
Iranian nuke sites than inspect them. The Iranians don't appear to be
willing to cave on the nuke inspection issue.



The option of making strikes at Iranian facilities must be kept on the
table until we're certain they're not building warheads... or even dirty
bombs... but they're smart enough to've put key facilities far
underground in hard-to-find places... even if you wouldn't have thought
of it. Got any idea how big a country Iran is? Remember Libya? Think
they haven't learned anything, just because you haven't?



Or Libya? And why do you think any inspection teams *have* to be led by an
American?



Led, accompanied by, whatever. The point is inspection teams with US
representatives on them.


That's better. But the point is that the inspection teams see everything
and come away with *real* assurance that no weapons are being produced.


The "protocols" change from administration to administration. Clinton
believed in appeasement


Says you. Whatever Clinton did, it worked. Proven.


... Bush believes in pre-emption.


Hard to say what Bush believes in, he's done everything from make
promises to making empy threats to actually invading countries that
present no threat to us.

DSK