"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
news

We *should* strive to increase tensions with Iran. They're a terrorist
state that is trying to develop a nuclear weapons program.

It's the way to peace.

No. But, it's the way to disarmament.

If you're a moron.

Not applicable.

Disarmament? Over the next 10 years, which country do you believe will add
the largest number of TOTALLY NEW types of nuclear weapons to its
collection, while still maintaining the old ones in an operational state?

Probably China. I know you were thinking that *we* will.

Nevertheless, it's a terrific deterrent. However, terrorist-sponsoring
states are not pursuing WMD's as "deterrents".





In other
words, he'd go back to the way things were before...when Libya was
developing WMD's, Saddam was developing missiles to strike Israel,
and
Iran
was very actively pursuing a nuclear program.

In other words? Actually, that's a conclusion only a moron could make.

The only reason bin Laden hasn't successfully usurped power in the
Middle
East is because of our presence over there. Kerry would remove the
cat...and once again, the mice would play.

Bin Laden, eh? I'm sure you've answered this question before, but try
again.
Definition of "news source": One whose stories on one topic last more than
2
minutes. With that in mind, which news sources do you listen to regularly?

*You* seem to do a good job at telling stories...and doing so for more than
2 minutes. Can I count you among my "regularly listened to news sources"?