"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
news

We *should* strive to increase tensions with Iran. They're a
terrorist
state that is trying to develop a nuclear weapons program.

It's the way to peace.

No. But, it's the way to disarmament.

If you're a moron.

Not applicable.

Disarmament? Over the next 10 years, which country do you believe will
add
the largest number of TOTALLY NEW types of nuclear weapons to its
collection, while still maintaining the old ones in an operational
state?

Probably China. I know you were thinking that *we* will.

Sorry. It's us. This is according to Sam Nunn and a few other left-wing
whores who'd like to see us leave a better world for our kids.



Nevertheless, it's a terrific deterrent. However, terrorist-sponsoring
states are not pursuing WMD's as "deterrents".

Yeah. It's a great deterrent. It worked real well in terms of keeping the
NYC skyline unaltered, didn't it? It's also kept the Russians from attacking
us with their rusting sub fleet.


Bin Laden, eh? I'm sure you've answered this question before, but try
again.
Definition of "news source": One whose stories on one topic last more
than
2
minutes. With that in mind, which news sources do you listen to
regularly?

*You* seem to do a good job at telling stories...and doing so for more
than
2 minutes. Can I count you among my "regularly listened to news sources"?



In the past two weeks, I've heard analyses by people who know these things,
saying that Bin Laden is likely to be a non-issue at this point. However,
9/11 gave quite a bit of confidence to thugs who are in no way connected
with OBL. But, just to entertain idiots, let's assume this was false. Where
would YOU pursue OBL if you were the president, instead of the queen of
Boca?