wrote in message

Good God, here we go again.


Then, if someones rights disappear when they enter someone elses
private property, our government should quit subsidizing them.

The government does not subsidize them.

Also, if
the above is true, would it mean that if someone enters my property,
that they have instantly 100% lost all of their rights as afforded by
the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, etc?

well, as usual, your interpretation is dead wrong; but in any event it is
apples and oranges; private property v. public conveyance


I'll bet that while still on
private property, she was read her Miranda RIGHTS!!!!!

what does private property have to do with miranda?