Skipper,
From what I can tell from your posts, you are suggesting Gould recommended
donating a boat to Charity for tax purposes, which is neither illegal or
immoral.


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
wrote:

I have done nothing to deserve the non-stop flaming this individual
began with his "open letter" thread and has continued ever since.

After Skipper left the NG you flamed him at every mention. You KNEW he
had over 50 years of boating experience and yet you called him a
"non-boater". That alone would be justification for most, but you went
further, placing him as the butt of your jokes with acquaintances over
beers. Skipper has plenty of cause for setting the record straight about
your integrity and honesty.

Are you now stating the conversations you had with Skipper about AIMS
did not happen?

Only a sick ******* takes up stalking a person from thread to thread to
lob disruptive insults. This character is surely not the first to pull
this nonsense in the NG, and probably won't be the last.

Why are you avoiding an open discussion about AIMS? Could it be because
that would show you in an unflattering light?

I can't imagine why.

I can, let's discuss and let the NG decide.

Here in the NG, we should discuss things posted to the NG. Not things
that one side of a private conversation changes the story after five
years or so and now claims were said.

We have some pretty smart participants in this NG. I think their powers
of perception can detect truth. Subjects need not be limited to only
what has been previously posted to this NG.

That said, I believe it has become all too obvious that you have no
intention of discussing AIMS, your role with that "marine research
operation", or your previous statements about that company. I believe
most NG readers also know the reason why.

For example: (the following incident never occured)...suppose I
suddenly appeared in the group to report, "When Skipper was last in
Seattle, he kept asking me if I knew anything about the Broadway
District. He said he had heard that it was a great place to pick up
underage boys willing to go down on fat old men for a little quick
spending cash. He reached in his pocket and pulled out a paper that
said, "For a good time, call so and so....." (etc, etc, you get the
point).....

As I've stated previously, you are truly a class act, Chucky.

Psuedo, what the same crazy heck would be the point of arguing about
that conversation in the NG? First, it was a private conversation
between you and me. Second, with a total lack of evidence available on
either side the "discussion" you call for would devolve into you
said/did not you said/did not you said/did not etc.

You sound like the typical used car salesman, Chucky. The point of
discussing AIMS and our previous conversations about it would be to
illuminate you and your conduct. Readers can and will come to their own
conclusions.

If you think its suddenly your role in life to challenge my ethics,
then do so with some incident or statement that is known to others in
the NG- not a "Gould said this, and in spite of my previous statements
to the contrary you'll now have to take my word for it..." bag of BS.

I'm challenging your conduct precisely BECAUSE of your conduct. I did
not insult and belittle you during my absence, you however did.

The only real record I have of anything Skipper or I said during or
about our meetings is the statement posted some time after our 2nd
meeting in Seattle.
Let's see, how does that go again....oh, yeah.......

JD's Survey Not so Powerful - Chuck is an honest broker. Had I used him
as my representative for a boat I'd seen before contacting him, he would
have saved us ... rec.boats - Oct 26 2001, 9:35 am by Skipper - 65
messages - 15 authors

That repeated snippet seems a bit like the refuge of a scoundrel to me.
I HAVE explained those comments.

GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).

You really are a class act, Chucky.

--
Skipper