"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
news

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no
weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting
them as fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.

Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one
sitting.

Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my
comments is beyond me.

Well, if YOU could get your ****ing knuckles off the ground for two
seconds your sorry ****sucking ass might have found this:

http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html


Nice mouth. So is that article a reason to flame another member here?

Can't you discuss things without going nuclear?

Why did you attack the messenger rather than try to refute the message?

Answer: because you know you can't do the latter, and you're too jacked
off on testosterone to realize that YOUR GUY ****ED UP. Face it: the
Niger story was manufactured by Israeli sympathizers in State and Defense
and funneled through the Italian government and press in a botched attempt
to hide its origins.

And, you have evidence that will stand up in a US court of law?

When significant events happen, the question to ask comes from the latin:
"Cui bono?" "Who benefits?" Well, an Iraq free of Saddam but mired in
internal conflict certainly benefits Israel more than any other nation,
people, religion, creed, race or football team on earth.

The beauracrcy that the CIA has become benefits by covering their collective
cushy asses.