"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:19:23 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Saddam and many other heads of state are always interested in
obtaining all sorts of weaponry and components. That doesn't mean they
have them, can get them, can use them if they get them, et cetera.
Saddam had WMD. If allowed he would have used them, again. Bush didn't
lie about
the WMD.
Right. Saddam's dog ate them.

I guess all these folks lied also.......eh?


You can repeat that list from now until the end of time, and it won't make
a difference. Talking up a problem and invading a country are not
equivalents.


You said Bush lied us into war, and specifically lied about WMD. The quotes
that JimH posted show that the prevailing belief among *both* sides of the
aisle in Congress was that Saddam had WMD. If Bush was simply restating
what *everybody* was already saying, then exactly how did he lie?

Hmmmmm?