Doug Kanter wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
wrote:
RCE wrote:
These guys still know how to rock.
Mrs.E and I went to see them a couple of years ago at the beginning
of
the
"Licks" tour at the Fleet Center in Boston. It was horrible because
of
the
disgusting sound system at the Center.
This performance was actually better, sound-wise.
RCE
You think?
The garage band down the block is tighter than the Stones were
tonight.
How the H do you flub up "Satisfaction" after 40 years? You could see
a
couple of the guys were really frustrated- I thought the bass player
was going to climb right up into the drummer's lap for a while there
as
they struggled to get their licks together. Lot's of unhappy glances
exchanged every time somebody screwed something up. They were
literally
"jamming" instead of performing. Very disappointing show.
My suggestion, fewer drugs and less booze before a performance- and
more rehearsals.
Yes sir...I don't know how the Stones justify their outrageous fees.
Have to admit, I've never seen them live...(my son wouldn't let me go
along with him & his buddies when they played the Maritimes last
summer)
but age & lifestyle is really creeping up on these guys.
I like to hear them the way they sounded in the 60s.
Now I don't think they're a reasonable facsimile of a rock band.
I agree. I thought they stunk last night. Maybe that is because I
generally never cared for them.
That's an intriguing comment only because I grew up listening to the
Stones and playing a lot of their music, and have always liked them a
lot. From two somewhat opposite perspectives, we managed to reach a
common conclusion.
Aside from purported drug use (or, in Richard's case, obvious), what do you
suggest they do? Stop doing what they enjoy?
Not at all. They should indeed continue to do what they enjoy. However,
they need to try to uphold some reasonable standards of professionalism
if they intend to continue doing it for money. Good thing they're the
"Rolling Stones", if it had been Joe Schwartz and the East Overshirt
Wannabees playing at the same level of proficiency (and it well could
have), ABC would have cut to a commercial after the second or third
major screw up.
There may be other explanations or excuses, but I think I say a poor
showing from a bunch of guys who thought they'd earn their million
bucks a minute (or whatever) simply by showing up and *being* the
Rolling Stones rather than by putting together a musically dynamic
three-song set. Maybe there comes a point in time when instead of
"rocking on!", it is just more dignified to rock off.