Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JIMinFL" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JIMinFL" wrote in message
k.net...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:Iu9Wf.5335 Uh oh. If my yacht's single motor dies, I don't fall
out of the sky and die.
If I'm trying to deal with insanely nasty weather, maneuvering around
big waves, it **may** be a problem. But, if a plane's single engine
dies, so do the occupants, unless they're still on the ground.
Your logic is flawed?
How is it flawed? Be sure to go back a few messages so you're clear on
what RCE responded to.
I'm sorry. I thought your statement was meant to stand on it's own. What
am I missing?
You can't depend on a boat without power to be able to be steered to a
soft landing on a sandy beach. On the other hand a powerless plane can
still be controlled in many cases.
Jim
We're talking about probability here, Jim. I see crippled boats towed into
the bay here all the time. I do not see ambulances waiting for the
occupants. You are right - if you're in hideous seas and you lose power,
you may be in deep ****. And, it *is* possible to land a crippled plane
safely, but the word "possible" is far from the word "likely".
Now you are being more reasonable.
Jim
|