On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:34:37 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2006 08:30:36 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers wrote:
What I think is so funny is JimH was all upset when JohnH made a few
comments about Race for Renee, but look at the number of comments JimH
has made concerning the "Scandal behind the Race for Renee".

I think he might want to forward this to the NYT or the Washington Post
for a more detailed follow up concerning Reneegate.


Do you have some ulterior motive for sustaining this?

Harry, did JimH have some ulterior motive for *starting* this? As you know,
you were the only person whose donation I offered to triple, yet JimH has
implied otherwise. Is there some reason you've not corrected him?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************



I've posted this before, and I'll post it again. I skip a lot of posts
here these days. My interest is sporadic. I do, though, see these damned
idiotic headers and I wonder why you just don't let this die. It
deserves to.

Uh, Harry? Where'd you go?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************