Time to change this very negative header? (was Jim H is a..........)
On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:31:42 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 20 May 2006 09:38:27 -0700, "
wrote:
Looks like this whole thread has wandered off into chatroom, personal
correspondence territory.
Would it be OK to use a different header?
Threads based on name calling and personal attack are never a helpful
thing, and once the focus has shifted from the alleged personality
traits of the unfortunate target there isn't a single reason to
continue dragging his name through the mud.
My 2 cents worth, keep the change. :-)
So if a post shows up under this header it should be disregarded because of
the header? What's wrong with the header? It's an honest, succinct header
that states a fact, not an allegation.
--
'Til next time,
John H
You're quite the piece of work.
Thanks, Harry. Is the Parker in the water yet?
--
'Til next time,
John H
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************
|