Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

You've got it backwards. Any chance that if Bush had NOT invaded
Iraq, he would have more friends, or at least more people who
would patiently wait for him to vanish from public life? Or, do
you think a person's deeds are not connected with his reputation?
I thought it was the intent rather than the action that determines
the effectiveness of a person or a project?
That makes no sense. If a project fails, but you gave it your best
effort, then your intent was wrong?
The intent of Johnson's great society was wrong, it failed.
Your conclusion: 100% of the time, when a project fails, the intent
was wrong.

Got it. Just wanted to make sure I understood you correctly.


Bush *needed* a war, for personal reasons. Cheney needed it for his
own reasons. It had nothing at all to do with the good of this
country.
What personal reasons?
Nothing you're educated enough to understand.

Why can't you them Doug and we will see if I can read them at least.



Read them? You can't even write a coherent sentence. Go back to high
school, Bertbrain. Try to graduate this time. Joining the marines is not
an excuse for dropping out of high school.

You and Doug aren't worth the effort to re-read what I write in this
newsgroup? Does that sound familiar, it should.