"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.

Good job there kOOk.

miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination
of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for
stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?

The nomination is ridiculous.

Note - To those

That would be my cue.

who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination
is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've
never participated, let it be known that there have been many
flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a
single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous,
unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on
cluelessness)

Precisely the opposite. Unfortunately, I'm still working with the very
same hand tied behind my back.

as opposed to being based on rational thought.

Honor is rational. Without it, civilization would not survive. If I had
no honor, this would be a different argument entirely.

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to
comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is fairly
understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if
somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's
basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it to
somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences, even
moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who possess
the character and courage to abide that standard. I think I've read
about one of you who does MMA training at one point or another. The
rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of conduct that serves
only to insulate you from any consequences for your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so,
and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so,
others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the
hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective
about this?

miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay