Thread
:
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
View Single Post
#
109
Harry Krause
Posts: n/a
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Dave Hall wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:27:18 -0400, "Bert Robbins"
wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Dave Hall wrote:
On 23 Jun 2004 15:22:13 GMT,
(Gould 0738) wrote:
It was even simpler than that. I just applied a chain of simple logic
based on the definitions previously provided. If "neo" is new, then if
someone is a "neo"conservative, that implies that they were
previously something else. The most common "other" ideology would be a
liberal. Therefore, a "new" conservative would most likely be an "old"
liberal.
Binary thinking at its finest. Only two possibilities to consider.
Sometimes that's all there is. Are you familiar with Occam's razor?
Dave
I am. Old William called for a minimum number of points *necessary*. For
issues as complex as a worldwide Islamist insurgency, black or white
ain't enough.
Sure it is. If you are an infidel you must convert to Islam or die by the
Islamic sword. Simple, black and white and binary.
That is the way our enemies think. Should we not respond in kind?
Dave
You mean, we should become what they are?
Reply With Quote