View Single Post
  #135   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default AT&T offer's VOIP

Jim wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:12:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..

So, yes, if certain laws don't fit in with my philosophy, it is OK
to break them. In fact, one is morally compelled to break them.


In a nation founded on laws, I wish you had said "morally compelled
to change them".

This nation runs on greed, not law.

While greed is the basis of the free market system, the nation is
run on
laws.

Really? Better call the White House and tell President Incompetent. As
"the decider," he believes otherwise.


Try to answer this question as honestly as you can.

What is the difference between your philosophy of morally compelled to
break laws you disagree with and, in theory, the President being
morally compelled to do the same?


Donkey ears is conditioned by his handlers to speak the party line. You
are asking too much of him Tom.



Ahh, Jim the Idiot is still with us.