Thread: 4cyl vs. 6cyl
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default 4cyl vs. 6cyl

On Apr 21, 9:23*pm, CTBob wrote:
I have sort of an "open" question. *I currently have an older (1982)
15.5’ trihull with 70HP outboard. *I am looking into buying a new boat
and would like some of your opinions on 4 cyl vs. 6 cyl. *I’m looking
for a bowrider 17’ to 19’ length. *I have been noticing that most of
the boats in this size range have the 4cyl engines, but some (most)
offer a 6 cyl option. *It would be used mostly in fresh water lakes
for pleasure/ fishing/ tubing/ some watersking and wakeboarding. *I
have two boys who think "the faster, the better". *Is the 6 cyl
option generally worth the extra money? *Would the 4 cyl generally be
underpowered? *I have heard both good and bad regarding both engines.
Any comments would be appreciated.

--
Posted at author's request, usinghttp://www.BoatingForumz.cominterface.
Articles individually moderated. Abuse/Problem? Report athttp://www.BoatingForumz.com/contact.html
Thread archive:http://www.BoatingForumz.com/4cyl-6c...pict98266.html


I'd go with the 4.3 v-6. The 4 cyl 3.0 is economical to run, but if
you're planning on doing a lot of floaty-toy things, you need the v-6.
PLUS it's quieter than the 4 and in a 17' you probably won't notice a
difference it the economy. Now up in a 19' boat you deffinately notice
a difference in the 6 over the 4 concerning the performance.

The 6 would be worth the extra investment.