On Sat, 17 May 2008 11:42:45 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 17, 11:10*am, wrote:
On May 17, 1:22*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

some snipped

"It looks like the snarks intent on destroying rec.boats have finally
succeeded. Too bad." Maybe anybody who considers him or herself a
"snark" or somebody "intent on destroying rec.boats" should view the
actual remark in question and see if they feel as personally targeted
as you apparently do. I must agree, anybody "intent on destroying
rec.boats" was called a "snark", but unless you are addressing a group
known to be intent on destroying rec.boats its ridiculous to complain
that the thread "is calling us names." Merely accepting your version
of reality rather than investigating the actual facts would lead folks
otherwise underinformed to the wrong conclusion- (which, of course, is
your deliberate intent).

Bull****!

Harry has called a certain group of people in rec.boats 'snarks' for
months. Perhaps you missed it? If he calls three people here 'snarks' and
then refers to the 'snarks' in your group, you can rationalize it?

You're good with words, but not that good.
--
John *H*