|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 487
|
|
The new, improved rec.boats
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 20, 2:31 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 20, 2:30 pm, wrote:
Idiot. Who do you think that's left here wants you back?
Priceless!
Yes, it is! You and Harry come right back here for punishment. You
both know damned good and well that NOT ONE PERSON HERE wants you
back. Take a look, Hertvick. Notice if you will, the tone and demeanor
of the group after you and Harry left. Are you too stupid to figure
out why?
Loogy, did you bother to read any of this?
IGNORE THEM!
Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."
They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.
Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!
Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get
rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.
May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send
them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.
So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.
--
John *H*
Why don't we go play at Chucks place while the babies ravage rec.boats.
|