Dave wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:33:04 -0700, Alan Gomes said:

If there is evidence to the contrary then it may
appear different to me at that time.

Even a cursory reading of the BoatUS advocacy piece should demonstrate that
there's evidence to the contrary. In fact, the trier of fact found the
insurance company's insured guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

But don't let a jury get in the way of your conclusions based on a story as
told to some reporter by the insurance company's lawyer.
Might want to actually read the Latitude 38 reporting before reaching
your conclusion about their source of information.

--AG