Canuck57 wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Illinois State Rifle Association
I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for
youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures
to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for
the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing.
No comment on the substance of the letter, eh? Damned if you do. Damned
if you don't
My comment on the NRA's politics is right there for you to see. Are you
not able to understand a sentence that says:

"Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political
posturing."
The NRA protects your right to shoot up stumpy. Shooting up stumpy does
nothing to feed your family or protect your home.

Not directly.

But if someone comes into you home with intent on raping your wife or
daughter you will feel comfortable in using it not on the stump, but the
intruder.

I don't actually own a firearm, difficult to do legally in Canada.
Criminals have them, police have them. But honest people don't. While
death of criminals by firearms is down, they refuse to acknowledge death by
knives, bats, even 4x4s is higher.

Your best national defence is it's honest citizens being trained and
possession firearms. If 20,000 Chinese invaded Canada from BC they would
find very little resistance in taking Canada.

2,000,000 Chinese were to land in Portland Oregon and would not likely make
it past the Rockies if they got that far.

A major step in controlling people is to disarm them.



If Krause was allowed to speak freely he would have to agree with you.