On Nov 1, 1:41*pm, Boater wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:15 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:35:52 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:30:19 -0400, Boater wrote:
There also have been questions about who actually paid for the materials
and labor to build her house.
Yup, questions, but I haven't heard of any investigations. *If I were a
Wasilla resident, I'd be more than curious.
I doubt anyone will care after Wednesday when the network slime
machine loses interest.
It is like Bill Clinton. Now that he is out of the (s)lime light,
nobody cares who he pulls his dick out in front of.
If Hillary had the nomination we would be hearing about everything
from the last girl he flashed to his whether Hillary and Chelsea
traveled on his Arkansas governor expense account. *Nobody cares about
the loser.
The media is interested in Palin because she came out of nowhere and was
put on the McCain ticket without being vetted. It turns out that almost
none of the great claims made about Palin were true, and that she has a
number of, uh, ethical lapses. Those, and her utter lack of knowledge in
areas where she should have some has built interest in her
unpreparedness and incompetency in the area of civics.

This is all McCain's fault and is illustrative of his bad judgment. He
rolled the dice with Palin and came up craps. He is not to be trusted at
the wheel of the ship of state.

I would suggest that some part of the RNC management put Palin in play
and that McCain is, at most, subject to bad advice. "Okay, give me a
name of someone the evangelicals will vote for"

It was McCain's call. Therefore it is McCain's fault. In the GOP, for
the moment, he calls the shots. Period.

Why did one of his handlers say from the first "McCain doesn't speak
for the campaign"?