"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:10:23 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"D.Duck" wrote in message
om...


So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html



Yup. It could have been so simple.

Eisboch

are you guys dense?

Summary
In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his
birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a
natural-born citizen.

That is NOT a copy of the original.


I think the Annenberg folks are a non-partisan group and they seem convinced
that they have seen, touched and photographed a *certified* copy (NOT the
original) of Obama's birth record. a certified copy in this format is
accepted by the State Department for passport purposes.

We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined
and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets
all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S.
citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are
false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as
"supporting documents" to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in
the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html


The following photos are linked on the above page:

http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_7.jpg

http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_1.jpg