Thread: 53-42
View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Boater Boater is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,666
Default 53-42

Tim wrote:
On Nov 4, 7:16 am, Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.
There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.
There is, eh? Got cites?
Article II, Section 1.
Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.
Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.
What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.

Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"



Questioned by who?

Right-wing droolers? Who cares?