On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:55:40 GMT, akheel
wrote:
wrote in :
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:38:10 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:39:48 -0400, wrote:
Criminal Negligence.
Many automobile liability claims arise out of criminally negligent
behavior such as DUI or reckless driving. The insurance still
pays.
A short Google revealed several cases where insurance companies
refused payment of benefits due to faulty equipment either as supplied
by the manufacturer or serious faults or repairs needed that are known
by the vehicle operator/owner.
Our law expert is citing law, not insurance company policies which
will vary from company to company. It doesn't mean, as he suggested,
that the insurance company will prevail in a lawsuit for payment, but
in some cases it may take that to get them to pay up. If he's really
a lawyer, he knows that.
Eisboch
You can be pretty certain he's not a lawyer.
I usually don't get involved in flame wars, but you're just wrong.
Highly doubful that I'm wrong. In usenet, the least credible way to
win an argument already in progress is to start throwing around
credentials. Only someone lacking real credentials tries that tactic,
because it's just so lame. To come out of the chute boasting about
your alleged law degree, you immediately lost the argument and labeled
yourself as a fool.
Your next move will no doubt be to tell us about cases you have won
against insurance companies, or the work you did for the NHTSB.
I hope you claim to have won cases against insurance companies, as
that will only reinforce the point that insurance may not pay. If
someone had to hire a lawyer and go to court in order to get paid,
then what Eisboch said is borne out.