On Apr 11, 11:14*am, wrote:
On Apr 11, 11:57*am, John H wrote:



On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:23:34 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Now they have attacked a US owned tug that was towing a barge or something.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090411/..._af/piracy_152

Eisboch

I cannot understand why these ships don't have .50 cals on the bow and
stern. The damn things will reach out and touch someone a mile away.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not." *
Thomas Jefferson

I keep hearing that armed ships are not allowed in some ports.. Seems
those ports should be empty for a while till they change their
attitudes... Another solution might be for these companies to hire a
couple of BlackWater types for each vessel. If a certain port wanted
to keep arms out, evacuate the BW guys just outside the ports
"security zone" and let the port security take the ship in... When the
ship leaves the security zone, have the BW guys placed back on board..
Just a thought...

I have also considered the cost and logistics, weather, port security,
etc... I know this would not be easy...

i was thinking the same thing. Have an armed security boat out in
Int'l waters, When the cargo ship gets out in the clear zone, then
security forces would load up on the vessel. And before it reached
it's POD, and while still out in Itn'l water another security boat
picks up the security forces and arms and the ship sails into it's
port. No defenses going out nor coming in, but in between?

well.....