Can you say Bitch?
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 18, 1:56 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
The senator was absolutely correct. That general would not have
addressed a male senator as mister. If he wanted to use that form of
speech, he could have properly and respectfully addressed her as Madam
Senator, madam being the full form of ma'am. "Senator," would have
been sufficient, as would have "Senator Boxer."
There is a protocol for addressing officials, and the fact that you
and the other uneducated ****s don't know it doesn't excuse those who
should know from not knowing.
You can tell by listening to the General that he addressed her as
"ma'am" purposely to indicate disrespect for her or her official
title. Sure he did.
He screwed up, that's all. A simple, innocent and human mistake.
I am sure this is hard to understand by those who never make mistakes.
Eisboch
During the exact same committee meeting General Walsh referred to the
male Senators at the hearing as "sir" without receiving even a dirty
look for any faux pas in protocol. Sure the correct protocol would have
been Senator, but the male senators focused on the purpose of the
meeting, instead of worrying about someone inadvertently using the wrong
title.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.
This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects
No need to insult bitches everywhere, just refer to her as "Democratic
Senator" which is as derogatory as possible.
I also agree with this post.
|