View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
Turby Turby is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Default Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:59:37 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:

Turby wrote:
Rod Speed wrote
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Datesfat Chicks wrote
Rod Speed wrote


I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary
medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded.


No it hasnt.


http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html


QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England
Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor,
Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along
with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the
Nazi data and the way it was obtained.


Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded.


My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher--
is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it.


You're wrong.


I didn't even know it was available.


Corse it is.


I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong.


Basically it hasnt been excluded.


The question of the "exclusion" of the music


No one is proposing that.


Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit.


Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be
burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either.


The medical data is available.


Correct.


Hard to find,


Nope.


and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote.


Wrong.


Probably enough to derail a career.


Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos'


Which pretty much excludes it use.


Like hell it does.


I don't have a horse in this race either way, but
you're pretty loose with those laconic answers.


You get to like that or lump it.

Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions?


Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with
even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed.

Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone
with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact?


You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything
even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except
in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears.


You know, I actually thought you were right, and had some experience
or personal knowledge about the subject, but were just too lazy to
expound on it. I have no idea who Pozos is, nor do I care. I've never
thought about whether data found by evil Nazi methods is acceptable or
censored. I don't think it really matters to me. But it's now obvious
that you're just another Usenet idiot with an attitude whose posts I
can ignore.

--
Turby the Turbosurfer