On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:54:41 -0700, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:33:04 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:59 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:58:39 -0700, jps wrote:
snipped for brevity
You must have supported Henry Hyde's investigation into Clinton's blow
job. The same Henry Hyde who was concurrently cheating on his wife.
Concurrently cheating on his wife? Egads! Miss Information strikes
again!
Wait! I think I understand. Hyde was cheating on his wife at the
same time he was cheating on his wife. You Leftists are so cagey!
Do you often run yourself in circles? Seems like a waste of energy
and so contrary to the run-of-the-mill straight line "conservative."
Oh well, to each his own.
Indubitably, there are some that are lacking for insight, and often
that mental impediment is set in place by political blindness. I
would recommend that you either look up the standard definition of
"concurrent," or else revisit the late Mr. Hyde's history. Unless, of
course, you are a Moore-sian revisionist and lack the courage to
subordinate yourself to intellectual honesty (that being my
prognosis).
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access