View Single Post
  #28   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
Rod Speed Rod Speed is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles

Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Turby wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Datesfat Chicks wrote
Rod Speed wrote


I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable
involuntary medical experiments during that era have
essentially been excluded.


No it hasnt.


http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html


QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New
England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the
Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's
refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments
was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained.


Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that
hasnt been excluded.


My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet
searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was
to exclude it.


You're wrong.


I didn't even know it was available.


Corse it is.


I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong.


Basically it hasnt been excluded.


The question of the "exclusion" of the music


No one is proposing that.


Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly
equivalent to exclusion in spirit.


Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be
burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either.


The medical data is available.


Correct.


Hard to find,


Nope.


and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote.


Wrong.


Probably enough to derail a career.


Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos'


Which pretty much excludes it use.


Like hell it does.


I don't have a horse in this race either way, but
you're pretty loose with those laconic answers.


You get to like that or lump it.


Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions?


Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with
even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed.


Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone
with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact?


You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything
even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except
in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears.


Pozoz may just not give a crap.


And clearly those who have published him havent either.


But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring,
I saw the hoops first hand.


Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does.


And what is your expertise in the medical field?


Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim.


He aint alone either.


It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis.


So no expertise,


You're lying now.


and bad vocabulary.


Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist.


Fits a dummy.


Leave you for dead, ****wit.


And the dummy resorts to foul language.


The ****wit trots out that pathetically hoary old line when its got done like a ****ing dinner, over and over again.